top of page

Forum Comments

Any news on Linear Rail Upgrades?
In General Discussion
Any news on Linear Rail Upgrades?
In General Discussion
Jay M
Jan 04, 2022
Excellent! Thank you!
0
0
Any news on Linear Rail Upgrades?
In General Discussion
Any news on Linear Rail Upgrades?
In General Discussion
Any news on Linear Rail Upgrades?
In General Discussion
Jay M
Jul 25, 2021
Addiction pics:
Content media
0
0
Is this nozzle path while extruding normal?
In 3D Printing
Space in the prints
In 3D Printing
Jay M
Jan 17, 2021
I am still learning, I never had issues like this myself, so hasn’t been something I have had to figure out. Unfortunately there aren’t many folks still working on getting their Axis tuned, so not sure if anyone else can help with some better, more experienced advice. First off, is the the PLA that came with the Axis? Was the bag vacuum sealed or was there some air in it? Of the originals red/blue rolls I received, one wasn‘t and it really wasn’t great. If you had two, i would try the other. Might want to buy another roll if you only have the one to try. Secondly with your bed’s level being off; as long as you ran the mesh bed leveling (G29), you should probably be ok. At least for me I as able to getter results by adding some 10mm (think that is right size, in my tuning post) in the mid points of the heated bed to good effect. That said, you cube does look like the pressure is building in the nozzle and popping out sometimes on the first layer in certain spots, the “squiggly“ parts on west and south sides of you cube bottom... however it doesn’t appear on the outmost lines... so while it might be leveling, I dunno. On the walls of the cube, hmmm. Having you printed (or had someone else print) your part cooling fan shroud yet? I could potentially see that being an issue from the bits and pieces of what I know. But again, could be the nozzle getting clogged (PLA quality/dryness above) or something else - were you super careful not to have any of the thermal/pipe tape on the top of the nozzle/heat break that could be blocking/dragging the filament a little? You mention you feel it isn’t under extrication, have you done the 10cm of filament testing to make sure your extruded steps are right? I believe Michael here posted about it. Essentially you measure off 10mm (or 20mm) on your filament, then extrude 10mm and measure the difference to the 20mm mark; then however much of a % of 10mm is left, you adjust you E steps by that amount. MakerTech also posted a new config file that changed from the original 95 down to 85 or something. I had to go back to 95, and I think I might need to go 105, ad I have been manually tuning flow up to 110 in the Tube menu for a while now and seems to be a bit better. I need to run that measurement test again. You could trying going to the Tune menu and adjusting flow up to 110 or 120 and see if you get different (better results). Like I said, I bet there are other things that other people know to try. But wanted to try and lend a hand. If you want to read through my tuning thread as well, can see everything I have done to get pretty good results so far.
Content media
1
0
Reason to stay with Axis 3D?
In 3D Printing
Jay M
Dec 09, 2020
Very tiny adjustments of the two eccentric guides for the X-axis build plate was my issue. Agree, at either extreme of the build base it is tight and does vibrate if too tight. The build base for mine is very slightly bent on the far right side, I (as carefully as I could) tried straightening/bending it out and did get a little better. Trick for me, was to adjust those guides just the tiny, tiny, tiniest little turn each separately and watch with a bright light directly above the plate, with a a straight edge (white paper worked well for me) and watch the shadow while moving X-axis 10-100mm each direction, to see if it moved side to side - I think I posted a video of what was happening somewhere in the forums. At first it would definitely shift .5-2mm as it would change from left to right direction... move +10, then move -10 observe the shift... slightly move first eccentric, repeat with second eccentric. While I had things working well, I changed out the couple and the lead-screw nut on my Z-Axis and I can no longer get Z-wobble under control. I shouldn't have touched it, since then - I've tried going back to exactly what I had and multiple other iterations and I cannot get rid of the 8mm Z-axis wobble showing up. I THINK I got really lucky just putting the lead-screw nut in the hole of the gantry when everything was working great - and now I can't get it back in the right spot of something. Grrrr. I have some new nuts to try - brass are bad, and the plastic ones seem to vary greatly... Should have left it alone once I got everything tuned. Except for that 8mm wobble though, everything else still works great on the unit. Good first layers (putting spacers in between the build plate and base plate helped a LOT here, especially in the middle around 150mm mark. Is tight enough in there that I didn't need screws/glue. That got the build surface straighter instead of warping up from the center to all the corners. I'll post about that at some point, just too busy.
0
0
After calibrating Z offset- the first layer still prints in the air
In 3D Printing
Jay M
Nov 01, 2020
I've now went to 15x10 measurement points. Turned off the Bilinear Subdivision and kept the Extrapolate Beyond Grid on. In my 80x80x0.2 first layer square I still had a couple of high points, so figured this should really help the accuracy and it's a one time thing essentially, so why not. Here is my grid now... Recv: Bilinear Leveling Grid: Recv: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Recv: 0 +1.502 +1.002 +0.970 +0.788 +0.635 +0.500 +0.375 +0.192 +0.402 +0.513 +0.592 +0.788 +1.045 +1.200 +1.580 Recv: 1 +1.407 +1.062 +0.825 +0.638 +0.470 +0.327 +0.255 +0.250 +0.242 +0.327 +0.415 +0.595 +0.855 +1.132 +1.442 Recv: 2 +1.287 +1.015 +0.730 +0.545 +0.427 +0.282 +0.207 +0.192 +0.172 +0.232 +0.332 +0.505 +0.765 +1.077 +1.360 Recv: 3 +1.170 +0.870 +0.630 +0.430 +0.297 +0.225 -0.090 -0.115 +0.073 +0.212 +0.280 +0.430 +0.678 +0.868 +1.230 Recv: 4 +0.703 +0.448 +0.558 +0.380 +0.262 +0.175 +0.100 +0.007 +0.095 +0.142 +0.225 +0.392 +0.582 +0.520 +0.952 Recv: 5 +1.097 +0.713 +0.538 +0.287 +0.147 +0.052 -0.015 -0.017 -0.032 +0.040 +0.102 +0.227 +0.442 +0.683 +0.968 Recv: 6 +1.055 +0.730 +0.445 +0.232 +0.075 -0.040 -0.085 -0.118 -0.085 -0.005 +0.067 +0.197 +0.400 +0.685 +0.988 Recv: 7 +0.940 +0.625 +0.297 +0.030 -0.130 -0.250 -0.297 -0.322 -0.330 -0.270 -0.187 -0.057 +0.145 +0.410 +0.755 Recv: 8 +0.730 +0.565 +0.260 -0.017 -0.167 -0.307 -0.568 -0.598 -0.518 -0.380 -0.273 -0.120 +0.005 +0.252 +0.680 Recv: 9 +0.553 +0.442 +0.157 -0.075 -0.295 -0.420 -0.565 -0.670 -0.648 -0.510 -0.413 -0.282 -0.100 +0.135 +0.538 Here is my mesh bed leveling config now... #if EITHER(AUTO_BED_LEVELING_LINEAR, AUTO_BED_LEVELING_BILINEAR) // Set the number of grid points per dimension. #define GRID_MAX_POINTS_X 15 #define GRID_MAX_POINTS_Y 10 // Probe along the Y axis, advancing X after each column //#define PROBE_Y_FIRST #if ENABLED(AUTO_BED_LEVELING_BILINEAR) // Beyond the probed grid, continue the implied tilt? // Default is to maintain the height of the nearest edge. #define EXTRAPOLATE_BEYOND_GRID // // Experimental Subdivision of the grid by Catmull-Rom method. // Synthesizes intermediate points to produce a more detailed mesh. // //#define ABL_BILINEAR_SUBDIVISION #if ENABLED(ABL_BILINEAR_SUBDIVISION) // Number of subdivisions between probe points #define BILINEAR_SUBDIVISIONS 3 #endif #endif
Z-Offset initial value
In Assembly
Jay M
Oct 29, 2020
You're welcome!

Jay M

More actions
bottom of page